We have spoken to your mother. We know everything.

Sunday, July 31, 2005

Can You Tell The Difference?

While Palestinians gear up for ever more violent attacks on Israelis, with more deadly rockets aimed at civilians and more powerful explosives, Israelis are going in the opposite direction.

That's right. Israel intends to combat terror with sand bullets because they are less lethal than even rubber bullets.

All in all, that contrasts the difference between Israel and her adversaries- rather clearly.

Finally, in the topsy-turvy world we live in,
And yet there is no getting around the fact that Israel is about to become the first modern, Western nation in more than 60 years to forcibly uproot a whole population -- men, women, children, babies -- solely because they are Jews. There is no getting around the fact that the forthcoming expulsions are rooted in the belief that any future Palestinian state must be Judenrein -- emptied of its Jews. And while it goes without saying that Sharon and every member of his government abominate the Nazis and all they stood for, there is no getting around the fact that disengagement is meant to appease an enemy that has always regarded the genocidal hatred of Jews in a very different light.
The rest is here. Read it all- and remember that in the end, these are the people that will use sand bullets.

Grandpa's Going For A Drive And Babysitting Isn't What It Used To be

Imagine. Driving for 82 years, never an accident and getting your licence pulled. No word on his wife's driving record.

Our babysitters were more like Eva Braun. Times have changed.

Coast Guard cutters, helicopters, police boats, rescue squads and who knows, maybe film from overhead at 11:00. Scotland Yard advises dinghy best move out of the marina.

Saturday, July 30, 2005

English Humor

A man inherited a parrot. At first he thought this was a good thing. But the parrot would do nothing but swear. It's language offended hardened sailors.

On the first day the man played the parrot soothing music and put its condition down to the stress of moving. On the second day he tried witty put downs. On the third day he ignored it. Nothing worked, the parrot still let forth a torrent of blue words.

On the fourth day he snapped and after a particularly creative insult involving his mother, a goat and the local vicar the man grabbed the parrot and thrust him into the freezer.

For a few minutes the parrot continued unabated. Then everything went quiet. The man, worried that he had killed the parrot, took a peek into the freezer. The parrot hopped out and was strangely silent, very cold and shivering. He finally spoke:

"I a-a-am so terr-r-r-ibly s-s-sorry, old chap, if I in any way offe-e-ended you earlier with my choice l-l-l-language....could I just ask......what did the chicken do?"

The Best Seats In The House

Santa union rejects Christmas in July. Won't the kids be happy?

Have you ever stood in line for concert or show tickets? Would you camp out overnight to see a Stars Wars premiere?

Here's another reason people are willing to be at the front of the line.

Speaking of Star Wars, what do you think a lightsaber is worth?

When you're Bill Gates, anything is possible.

Saturday night pizza party quote:
"You need cheese stuffed into a pizza crust like you need reverse liposuction to force more fat under your skin."
-- Jayne G. Hurley, pizza expert

Nice imagery, don't you think?

Carnival Of The Idiots

You really can't make this stuff up. From the Globe and Mail:

There have been salvage operations to recover gold, silver coins and other forms of sunken treasure. But in a first, divers plunged to the depths of Quebec's Saguenay River yesterday to recover 2,000 pounds of sunken cheddar.
Yup, cheese. How did the cheese get to bottom of the river? Storm? Shipwreck? Terror plot?
The cheese was deliberately dropped to the bottom...Elsewhere in the world, cheese-makers ripen their Gorgonzola in dark cellars and age their fine Roqueforts in caves. Mr. Boivin, taking the art of cheese-making to new depths, decided last fall to sink 10 barrels of cheddar into the water to see how it would ripen.
Where did this flash of brilliance come from?
He was inspired by a fisherman who wandered into La Fromagerie Boivin a few years ago after finding a block of Boivin cheese at the bottom of a lake. No one knew how long it had been there, but Mr. Boivin, a fourth-generation cheese-maker, tried it.

"It was one of the best cheeses I've ever tasted," Mr. Boivin said in an interview yesterday.

Now, let's be clear. Would you eat a piece of cheese from the bottom of a river, with who knows how much fish, er, waste, er...never mind. You get the point.

Now let's get back to the matter at hand. Apparently, one ton of cheese, dropped in the river has gone missing. The name of the river, you ask? Baie des Ha! Ha! en francais. No, we're not making this up.

Naturally, there are divers looking for the cheese. See the story here.

We can see it now- Bobbing for cheese parties.

Theology By Video

Just another Saturday. Quiet, peaceful and relaxing.

Then again, there are some people who make the most of their time. See this, if you want to sit back and be entertained. We don't know if we should laugh or cry- or be outraged.

Friday, July 29, 2005

The Dark Side Of God

There is a dark side to God and Faith. When we acknowledge that, we are faced with questions that are hard to fathom and and even harder to answer. We want to ignore them, or pretend the issues aren't there. Religious wars aren't new. Death imposed- murder- welcomed in the name of God, isn't a new phenomena.

There is an important reality that needs clarification. There is no such thing as religious violence. There is only violence committed in the name of religion. We will discuss that later.

Notwithstanding the violence and admonitions to violence in the Bible, there is one inescapable truth: God did not create man and this world, so that we might destroy each other and ourselves.

That means that biblical admonitions to violence must be viewed in context and not in a vacuum. In stark opposition to biblical violence are those ideals and standards that compromise the guideposts to which we strive. The bible is clear- violence is a small part of the reality our lives. By contrast, the bible is the guidebook to day to day living with each other.We are to help each other, nourish each other and support each other. If we accept that our mission on this earth is not to destroy each other, then we must accept as truth that the principal part of our lives is to be spent living in peace and harmony. We are all connected, each of us. The accumulation of our contributions are what define us as a community. Those that do not contribute, exclude themselves from that community, of course- and that weakens the community in general. It is our collective mission to bring light into this world, not darkness.

This of course, in antithetical to notions of Jihad and Crusade. Implicit in those provocative words, is the reality that in the past, those words were also defined as violence committed in the name of religion- and the ensuing forced conversions.

Christianity has learned the lesson. There are no offensive wars fought for in the name of God. It is true that Christian and other nations are at war- but they do not fight for a specific religion. We, and they, fight for the truth, that all men are free and deserve to be free. We fight for the human dignity that God has bestowed on each of us. At times, we struggle mightily against our adversaries, as in Iraq and Afghanistan. At other times, we do not fight hard enough, as in Darfur.

The wars we fight are not just inequities. They are an impediment to our progress, that part of us that strives to "beat our swords into plowshares." The unabashed and frenzied bigotry belie any lessons we have learned. "Am I my brothers keeper?" is drowned out in cacophony of visceral hatred. There are no brothers, to some. We are kept from our growth, spiritual and moral, by the hate.

Mankind is supposed to progress- it is the natural way. We are supposed to learn from our past. Most of us do, some don't. For example, it should be inconceivable that the history of the latter half of the 20th century would repeat itself- yet clearly, there are those, who in the name of religion, issue clarion calls to destroy and to hate. More disturbing is that there are people responding to those calls to hate.

It is in this context that we can understand the biblical call to violence. We are not called to violence in vacuum, but rather, in context. If we do not respond to that call, then we fail not just God, but more importantly, ourselves, our community and our future. We are called to rid the world of evil, so that we- and good, might thrive even further. We are never called to violence to promote false religious or political agendas. Those who promote false religious or political agendas try to do so by co-opting God. They claim to speak for God- as if God could not speak for himself, as if those deceivers could reinterpret God's words.

As we noted earlier, Justice is not a simple matter.
Even when it God that dispenses that Justice and decrees that life or liberty need be taken, Justice is dispensed somberly and without joy. Indeed, there is even sorrow.
We know that even when fighting for what is right, there is sorrow in the Heavens. Violence is never without cost- even when prescribed by God. Why? Because that violence is antithetical to our purpose- and if we have put ourselves in a situation in which we must engage in violence, we will be called to task. David, was precluded by God from building the Temple because he 'had blood on his hands.' Even the legacy of David, the Psalmist, could not trump the legacy of David, the warrior. Instead, the task of building the House of God fell upon his son, Solomon.

Despite the violence and evil, we are capable of the highest of human ideals- mercy, forgiveness and love. In a history replete with wars, mankind still produced art. With a history of so much hate, much of manikind still strives for idealistic causes. That is our legacy- and that is our natural state.

We have often said that cultures and religions are measured by what they contribute and not by what they destroy.

Our adversaries, by deeds, actions and own admission, have destroyed much and wish to destroy even more. They wish to upend the truth that we are not meant to destroy each other. We do not go to war easily. Indeed, we wish peace with our neighbors. peace by definition, means equality, a live and let live culture. Our adversaries want peace based on our capitulation to an evil that destroys and hates.

That is an evil we must fight. It is from that darkness that light emerges.

The Inmates Are Running The Asylum

So much for the bogus 'anti-terror' fatwa. As it turns out, it's a case of wife beaters writing anti wife beating legislation.

There is more here- and it's depressing to realize that our vaunted press follows along. Yet, when it comes to actually fighting terror, everything is suspect.

See more here, here and here- where quite clearly, the killing of Israeli Jews remains outside the fatwa.

How civilized.

It's Friday

C'mon, you want to do it. You did it as a kid. Why be shy now?

Rest In Peace? Not always.

Hungry? As far as we are concerned, we're not getting on a plane with these guys.

How to over bake Harry Potter
- Can college courses be far behind?

Why to use H&R Block. They deal with the tax people for you.

Sex, as seen through Geek eyes. Wow.

Email, Symbols And Ideas

Last night, we received a number of emails about our post, Robert E. Lee, Osama Bin Laden And Civil War Lessons. Some of the emails were, shall we say, less than savory, taking umbrage with our notion that venerating Confederate Civil War heroes might be less than honorable.

We received other emails, attempting to explain the propensity Southerners have for identifying with the Confederate ideals. Tommy, of the excellent Striving for Average, wrote one such email. He cites three reasons for the strong attachment.
"As much as the south was on the losing and wrong side of the war, it is who they are. I don't know the percentage of people that fall under that but it really is harmless. It's sort of like having the ancestor that was a very unpleasant criminal, not something you are proud of really, but it is sort of a colorful part of the fabric of the family. It's acknowledged and maybe even celebrated in an odd sort of way."
Usually, we agree with Tommy's take on most things. This time however, we take exception. If that 'colorful past' included some of the most heinous crimes, just how much celebrating is in order? Slavery wasn't only about picking cotton. It was about torture, rape, beatings and other degradations. Would we tolerate the Iranians who took the US Embassy hostages celebrating the event and see it as a harmless?
The second one is a general feeling of rebelling against authority. Every region and ethnic group has them, but in the south they are issued a set of symbols to go with it.
In our opinion, it is a sad day when rebelling against authority means adopting and venerating symbols that are so offensive. We think Tommy realizes this, because he immediately follows up with what we believe is his most accurate point:
The third group are the racists and such. They are the problem that everyone thinks they are, using the same symbols as the previous groups and that is the issue that comes up with a lot of people over the confederate flag and everything else. They are quite happy to let everyone else put a flag in the window even though they aren't racist and then pretend to be a much larger group than they really are.
There it is. The symbols, ideology and social structure of those who carry prejudice are amplified through those symbols. What does that say, or mean, for those who tolerate or those who remain ambivalent toward wards those symbols. In fact, Tommy answers himself:
The other group get frustrated that the smaller extreme group has managed to set the tone for what everything means. The truth of course is you don't have to stretch the truth to find racial issues with the confederate flag or other symbols of the confederacy.
As we stated yesterday, we need to look into the mirror. The fight for freedom is now at our doorstep. Freedom has become more than an set of political values or a vent for free expression. With each bombing, we are reminded that freedom comes with a real cost. Like the holder of a most precious possession, we who keep that freedom are targets for those who want to take it from us- not to experience it for themselves, but rather to exploit it for their own uses. In Iraq, civilians are blown up every day for no other reason than for some, freedom would usurp their evil. Free people can accomplish anything. Free people can make choices for themselves.

Most importantly, free people can be trusted to create a society that is fair and open to all. No society is perfect, but free societies tend to be self correcting. In an open and free society, there are no classes of people that can oppress others. That, most of all, is what the enemies of freedom fear most. Their power is based on fear and intimidation. They use the symbols and rituals of religion to promulgate their hatred. In a free society, power is predicated and manifested in the free markets of thoughts and ideas.

We have long since abandoned the ideologies of hate and evil. It is time we abandoned the symbols, too.

Tommy noted in a comment a part of his letter that we did not publish- which we should have.
Whether you fly the flag or not doesn't change the history that it represents, those things still happened even if you take it down. On the other hand keeping it flying for many, was just a method of tormenting some people. If it really is such a divisive issue that can be resolved simply by taking a flag off of a building, what sort of idiot insists on flying it? If you insist that it shouldn't be that important to them, then it probably shouldn't be that important to you.

Thursday, July 28, 2005

The What And Why

A reader wrote us and asked why we were writing and opining on religion, as of late. Specifically, he wanted to know what we really believed.
Bidden Or Unbidden, God Is There.
Carl Jung, put it most exquisitely and succinctly, when asked of God. He replied with those words, discovered among the Latin writings of Erasmus, who in turn credited the ancient Spartans with their origin.

Jung had those words inscribed over the doorway of his house, and upon his tomb.

Robert E Lee, Osama Bin Laden And Civil War Lessons

This is the post that will get us into trouble. We have thought about this post, and it's message, a lot. We have decided to post it, anyway. We think it is important. Now, we love the South and Southerners. This is our home and we wouldn't have it any other way. It is for that reason we want to address these issues raised in our post. We want to make our home a that much better place to live.

All through the South, there are monuments to the Confederate heroes of the Civil War. There are statues to Robert E Lee, Jefferson Davis and Andrew 'Stonewall' Jackson and every place more than 3 rounds were fired is designated a historic battlefield.

Why is that?

There may have been more than one reason over which the Civil War was fought, but in the end, they all paled before the tenacity of the South as they fought to retain the institution of slavery. There is no getting around that. It is true that many southerners did not approve of slavery, but in the end, they took up arms to defend a society and culture that defended that terror. To be clear and not obtuse, slavery meant that people were auctioned off- torn away from their families and men, women and children were whipped mercilessly. Human beings were tortured and oppressed, from birth to death. And yet, to this day, throughout the South, the Stars and Bars are flown, the flag under which slavery was defended and fought for, displayed as both a source of pride and a declaration of defiance.

Now, we, as a nation, are fighting a war on terror and we are demanding that good men stand up and be counted. We are asking people to repudiate evil, totally, to divorce themselves from any and all symbols of evil.

We need to look long and hard- at ourselves. Free people everywhere, and Americans in particular, need to take a painful look in the mirror. As history has shown, Americans set the standards for defining freedom.

We are not comparing the radical Islamists and the soldiers of the Confederacy. No Southerners celebrated the death and destruction of innocents. There was no war against civilians, blessed and cheered on by Southern clergy. Further, that was fought at a very different time in history, with very different sensibilities. There is no excuse today for the kind of evil the Islamists espouse.

Nevertheless, there is a whispered truth that must be addressed. Slavery, the institution the Confederacy defended with their lives, was in fact not much different than evil radical Islamists espouse today. The Islamists are fighting to keep an entire culture enslaved. The Islamists are fighting to keep Muslims from claiming the freedom all men deserve. They fight to keep women oppressed and subject to beatings and humiliation. In fact, there is no more nobility in the actions of the radical Islamists than there was in the Southern fight to preserve slavery.

Of course, these Radical Islamists are no more than the next chapter of Muslim slavemasters, started and continued today, by evil and tyrannical despots.

The United States would be a very different country had the South won the war, or had left the Union. That, happily, did not happen- for which we believe, has been to the benefit of all mankind. That said, we cannot glorify and romanticize those who fought for evil. If we do, we cannot make that demand of others. Why should they totally abandon the evil or the romanticizing of evil doers? We haven't, as of yet- and we are the ones the world looks to for it's cues on how to define and exercise freedom.

There are no reasons religious people, of any faith, should tolerate those who would make heroes of those men who would deny that we are all children of God.

How Canadians Are Different

We have just learned that this is a long weekend in Canada. This upcoming holiday is celebrated every year on the first Monday of August.

The Holiday is called Civic Day. This holiday does not commemorate an event and it does not celebrate the life or death of anybody.

Now, far be it from us to impugn Canada or Canadians, but don't you think they could have found an actual reason to take the day off? There must have been some Canadian who did something worthwhile that might be recognized and applauded. Or, perhaps an event that Canadians as a Nation might understand.

For example, on August 8, 1882, a snowstorm struck ships on Lake Michigan, leaving six inches of snow and slush on their decks. Imagine that- six inches of snow in August! Can you think of anything better than snow to bring Canadians together?

In any event, we at the SC&A Institute are offering Canadians and everyone else, a reason to celebrate.

See this
and recognize our neighbors to the north for their special characteristics and come to see that what makes Canada and Canadians so special. It's nice to know that in the end, they really are kind of like us, after all.

Happy Civic Day.

*This post was approved for publication by NG and the Office of Canadian Sensibilities.*

*UPDATE* God Isn't Our Dance Partner, Or, Justice Is No Joy

Everyone knows the story of the Israelites escape from Egypt. After they crossed the Red Sea with Pharoah on their heels, they were saved by the miracle of the waters closing in on the hapless Egyptians. The bible records that the Israelites, in celebration upon reaching the far shore, they started to dance in joy at their salvation.

Last night, we learned something rather extraordinary. The famous Jewish commentator on the bible, referred to as Rashi (an acronym of his initials) , made the following observation on the story of the Exodus.

When God saw that the Israelites were celebrating and dancing, he rebukes them. Says God, "How dare you dance while my children are dying!" (an erudite reader, Ben David, notes in the comment section that it was the Angels who were rebuked, not the Israelites. If that is indeed the correct version, our point, we believe, is honed even further. As we said, "it is interesting that the angels, who, close to God- and thus more aware of His Dominion, needed the rebuke).

This is extraordinary. It was God Himself, after all, who meted out the Divine Justice. There could be no mistake as to the Divine Justice that was imposed. Nevertheless, God reminds- and chastises- the Israelites (and the Angels) that Justice, even Divine Justice, comes at a cost. Even when it God that dispenses that Justice and decrees that life or liberty need be taken, Justice is dispensed somberly and without joy. Indeed, there is even sorrow.

How much more so should that be so when the Justice dispensed is of earthly origin?

There are those that claim to be speaking for God and doing His bidding, whereas in reality, they are pursuing an agenda of evil, cloaked in religiosity. Some zealots even take it upon themselves to commit murder and acts of terror on a massive scale and claim that God receives in joy, their acts of evil and depravity, done in His name. The works of terror are celebrated by clerics and are applauded in Houses of Worship. The evil doers, those who would kill innocents without provocation are referred to as martyrs. These men of evil and their deeds are revered and are said to be worthy of emulation. There is much dancing and celebrating at death, and no regard for the implication of the act.

In an earlier post, Those Who Parent, Those Who Don't And The Truth About Terror, we made the following observation:
The biblical tale of Abraham and Isaac is instructive. No matter how willing his servant is, God does not allow Abraham to sacrifice his son.

God does not demand from Abraham that he obviate his role as a parent. He insists rather, that Abraham resume his natural role as a parent. God does not need Abraham's son as a sacrifice.
God does not demand that we sacrifice our children. That truth speaks for itself. There is another truth that needs to be reiterated. What distinguishes real believers is their reluctance to kill and their distaste for it. Irrespective of the cause, even a cause seemingly just, killing is never the goal. The cost of a military victory is understood.

The Old Testament provides the lesson of winning a battle: Surround your enemy only on three sides- always allow him the opportunity to flee. In other words, even in battle, we are admonished to 'Choose Life.'

We do not kill with joy. We do not place civilians, or schoolchildren or the sick an infirm in harms way. We do not engage an enemy, hiding behind children. We develop weapons that are ever more accurate. Others develop weapons that can be ever more widely dispersed.

To kill with joy- and to celebrate death, is to disregard God. To commit terror and celebrate the deaths of innocents, is to dishonor God and to refute his Dominion. Those who disregard His message corrupt and debase His message.

Those who find justification or apology for such acts, or blame the victim, disgrace themselves and their faith. In the community of believers, they accomplish nothing but shame themselves.

*UPDATE* Dr Sanity makes clear the religious distinctions and overtones we are discussing.
While one of the definitions of the word "martyr" is a person who sacrifices their life for a principle, in practice the entire Islamic concept of martyrdom is quite bizarre. If there is an underlying principle, then it is hatred, pure and simple.

Traditionally -- in Christianity, at least--a "martyr" was someone persecuted and killed by others for their religion's sake. In the lives of many martyrs, their shining love for their religion was so inspiring that it might even convert those who were responsible for the martyr's death.

But in Islam a "martyr" is a person who persecutes and kills others for their religion. Note the difference. By any rational definition, a person in this latter group is a monster. The indiscriminant slaughter of innocent lives inspires only the utmost revulsion in normal people. Converting to a religion that supports and encourages martyrs like that would be the height of insanity and self-delusion.
Kind of puts things in perspective, doesnt it? Read the Dr Sanity post here. It is relevant, timely and important.

We Resemble That Remark

We read an interesting post from the archives of Dust My Broom, about the struggle for the custody of a child.

It isn't a pretty story or heartwarming, in the classic sense. It is a tale of alcohol and not caring. It is the story of how children can be used as playing pieces in a seemingly never ending game. The game is played out, in exquisite slow motion.
One ploy that they brought into play was that I was suddenly not my son'’s real father. I was in an examination with the lawyers and that money grubbin grandmother bitch (still bitter, sorry). I had on me two pictures that day when they sprung that question: How do you know your the father?
Darcey answers well and bravely- and like so many stories of a similar kind, it will break your heart.

His post is a short vignette, really. The reader won't find grand sweeping descriptions or tales of unearthly angst. What the reader will find is a slice of life- the sharp pain, the dull ache and in the end, resolution and beauty.

Who we are, can be defined by responses to an accumulation of the short vignettes of our lives. How we respond to the trials and tribulations that might break us, or those obstacles we overcome in adefinitivee way, are the outline of what is on the canvas of our lives.

What fills in those outlines on that canvas and what colors we use, are what we have learned from those vignettes- and how we apply those lessons to our daily lives.

Darcey, of Dust My Broom, paints an interesting picture. Read his post, here.

Wednesday, July 27, 2005

Wasted Mind? Politics Calls

Via Kate, of Small Dead Animals, comes the following pearl. In response to a spate of shootings in Toronto, The National Post reports as follows:
The Mayor blamed lax gun laws in the United States for some of Toronto's violence, saying half the firearms in the city originated in America.

"It really is time to establish an effective strategy, working with the United States, to stop the easy access for guns that people are going to bring to Canada," Mr. Miller said.

"It's a huge problem and it's just not acceptable."

Interesting. It isn't that Canadian criminals are buying the guns in the US. The problem isn't with the Canadian border agents that cannot seem to find the weapons smuggled into Canada and it isn't the fault of criminals actually shooting each other. Of course, the mayor seems satisfied that half the shootings were committed by guns sold in Canada. No problem there.

No siree, it's the US that is to blame.

SC&A have a proposal. Since Molson, Labatt, Moosehead are Canadian imports, and since there is an ongoing drunk driving problem here in the US, we submit that all Canadian alcohol be prohibited from being imported into the US.

After all, as the Mayor of Toronto points out, citizens cannot be trusted or expected to exercise reasonable judgement.

Therefore, we must limit access to those products where use may result in a dangerous situation. Inasmuch as drunk driving is a big enough problem here we see no need to exacerbate the problem with Canadian beer.

Of course, Canadian beef helps contribute to obesity in the US, so we need to stop imports of cattle and beef immediately. We know His Honor, mayor of Toronto, wouldn't want to contribute to American ill health.

Speaking of danger, we can all be safer if we didn't import any new cars from Canadian plants. We can get by with fewer new cars. Certainly we can bring car plants down to the US, so Canadians would not be burdened by the guilt of knowing cars they helped manufacture might be involved in serious accidents.

You get the point. The mayor of Torontro may be a very nice, well meaning man. Maybe.

What we can say for certain, is that he is an idiot.

Darcey On The Couch

SC&A have decided to put Darcey, of Dust My Broom on the couch because we believe his is a voice worth listening to.

Darcey is different, by his own admission. He is a Canadian, for starters- but not isolated. He lived in the US for a number of years and 'speaks our language.' Ethnically, he is a Metis (strictly speaking, of French/Native origin) , a rather distinct minority found mostly in Manitoba. Louis Riel was a Metis who in the quest for recognition for his people, nearly toppled a nation. The Riel rebellion is a fascinating study of what went wrong- and right- in a distinct chapter in Canada's search for itself. The after effects are being played out today, in Quebec and in the Canadian west in particular. Darcey has lived and thrived on both sides of the fence. He knows the discrimination that minorities face, intimately. He also knows to take on all comers- and walk out, head high, not by virtue of special treatment, but rather, by virtue of special effort- his own.

We will review Dust My Broom in depth, later on. We wanted to talk with Darcey because we think his point of view encompasses a lot of ground and his background gives his views a depth that many of us cannot understand.

You may not always agree with Darcey's point of view but you will respect him.


There are two Canada’s, liberal and conservative. The distinction between the two are far greater than in the US. Why is that?

Good question. Canadian’s do tend to bunch up on either side of a line. In the US, individual action is promoted which tends to cause more cross-over which can blur or scratch out a distinct line. In Canada, the government wants to be more representative of the people and so it comes down to you want what the government wants or you don’t. If you don’t want what they want then your either a conservative or liberal. The effect of lobby groups or secular organizations do not have the power in Canada that they have in the US.

What fuels Carolyn Parrish and the anti-Americanism in Canada?

Penis envy – the US has bigger missiles! Just kidding we don’t have any…missiles that is. You ever hear a Canadian snowbird on vacation in Florida bitching about the US? Back in the Canadian winter and subjected to Barbie-groin they have plenty to say.

I think a couple of things contribute. Since Canada is a smaller power there is a tendency to internally create or portray a more virtuous person to make up for the lack in power. Another reason would be the fear of foreign ownership and cultural take-over (virtuous), - US manifest destiny. Another tendency Canadians have is to blame the US as a whole for many things such as trade sanctions simply because they do not realize the power of individual lobby groups in the US (See question 1).

Will Canada ever reach the point where it will be able to meet it’s military obligations to NATO again?

Not possible with the current ideology of our government.

Will we see the breakup of Canada in our lifetime? Why?

I don’t believe we will see it but I do believe there will once again be some close encounters. If anyone leaves it will be Quebec and that is part of the downfall of the absolutist multiculturalism ideology. When you work to promote a distinct society you of course create alienation and separatist tendencies.

What is the difference between Americans and Canadians?

Americans work harder but Canadians who work are more efficient at working. I think it has something to do with wearing mitts a large proportion of the year. Just my observation of course. With five years living in the states I can say that I did not find any obvious differences between everyday people in either country but then I suppose that reasoning comes down to who would hangout with me! But honestly, face to face with people, I never noted any outstanding cultural differences.

You are a Metis – tell us what that is, exactly, and more importantly, what it means to be part of a Canadian ethnic minority and what it means to successfully integrate into society.

Métis - a half-breed of white and Indian parentage. That is the blunt definition but in Canada it has been rounded to include non-treaty Indians and all mixed-blood people of native and European races. The definition also does not take into account a long standing culture.

I don’t read much into the word integration. I don’t believe I ever saw myself as less than anyone else. I am more proud of myself for desegregating myself from the status quo which sucks up so many people into a never ending circle. It was tough to leave but it was required as a survival aspect to save myself. I did not lose touch with any cultural aspects or traditions but instead they became enhanced in my search to find and help myself. I am proud of who I am and it took a long time to get here. My quest is beginning to help others out of the circle. It is hard to see people including persons in my own family not wanting and therefore not wanting to be because I’ve been there. There is a whole world out there to be explored but some people never see it and because of that can never prosper.

Louis Riel was one of North America’s first successful minority advocates for equal rights. What do you think his first reaction would be to the state of affairs of the Metis and the Native community today?

I actually think if he was to review history including the rise of the Metis people from the landlessness of scrip, he would be quite proud. The Metis have come a long way. From scattered disseminated groups that nobody wanted to the growing force today. There is of course much more to be done but I think he would be glad that his spirit of defiance lives on.

“We are men, free and spirited men and we will not allow even the Dominion of Canada to trample on our rights - Riel”

If you were put in charge, how would you deal with the problems the Metis and Native communities face? What would you want changed and what would you want taught in schools?

Tough question and open to much speculation and I can only answer based upon my own experiences. First I imagine would be to work towards getting rid of the dependency syndrome. I could state that I would create initiatives for aboriginal owned businesses and education to help create self-reliance but that is already being done. The problem lies deeper than that. Not enough people take advantage of what is there and some possible reasons are that people do not know the programs exist or don’t believe they can achieve anything and so don’t bother trying.

Change needs to come within so I would pursue the creation of aboriginal mentoring programs similar to Big Brothers and Boy Scouts and the like in these small communities. Dreams and goals need to be encouraged in people when they are young and the hope would be that dreams turn to achievements that continue growing.

If I could go back in time to change anything it would be the right of aboriginals to harvest anything off their land and sell it. Using sustainable techniques of course. Who better for that then the people who know the land? There is no reason why aboriginals can’t mine, log, fish and hunt for profit. Instead of trapping why couldn’t you have fur farms? Deer, elk, and buffalo could be raised in herds and sold like cattle. Some of these do exist in various stages but the government imposes too many restrictions of various forms that detract from the motivation to pursue a lot of it. If it is their land then let them use it in any way they want.

Not complete problem solvers by any means, just some notables that I feel are important.

We’ve been talking about the Metis and Native communities in Canada. What greater lessons can be learned in the US and global communities from Canada’s experience?

What not to do of course, however exploitation dates back hundreds of years but it also took place in a world where people did not have the social values that exist today. Blaming the European influx is outdated as I believe those lessons have been learned.

Over the last 50 or so years the biggest mistake has been the forced attendance of aboriginals at residential schools. They destroyed family units and I believe this is greatly responsible for the cycle of despair that exists today. Destroying families destroys worlds.

The war on terror is a reality. What do we need to safeguard against and what do we need to vigorously pursue, even if it means being politically incorrect?

We can’t show pity for those who would seek to kill us. For those who would seek to kill us, track them down and put them away using any means possible. If it means isolating a couple of suspicious people at an airport who are of a particular race, so be it. It beats burying 3,000 dead. If it means infiltrating into suspicious mosques with spies, so be it. It will allay fears.

SC&A Online Degree Program

Since we have talking about religion, we thought we would take the opportunity present thoughtful and cogent articles about religion- and various religions, for your consideration.

Today, we're taking a look at Dispensationalism- which is a peculiarly American type of Christianity. We chose Dispensationalism by design- Americans are familiar with bits and pieces of it. From Wikipedia:
"Dispensationalism is a branch of Christian theology that (1) teaches Biblical history as being best understood in light of a number of successive economies or administrations under God, which it calls "dispensations," and (2) emphasizes prophecy of the end-times and the pre-tribulation rapture view of Christ's second coming."
Anyway, here it is. It is an interesting read and quite informative- and being informed never hurt anyone.

The Cat's Out Of The Bag or How We Landed NG

How did we do it? How did we manage to land NG?

Here's how. It isn't rocket science. Are we ready for a reality TV advice show or or what?

Hot Salsa

Weather update: It is currently 103 degrees, with a heat index reading of 111 degrees- and we are still a good 2-3 hours away from the 'heat of the day.'

We did what anybody would have done. We had Mexican for lunch. When it's hot, head for Moe's. How hot is it? Well, check this out.

What do you do to beat the heat?

Where Are The NYT And WAPO?

Via Dust My Broom, news from Iran: Government Report Acknowledges Torture in Prisons.
Iran's hard-line judiciary has acknowledged in an unprecedented report that human-rights abuses, including torture, have taken place in prisons. The report says prisoners were sometimes detained over a long period of time without trial. They were blindfolded, beaten, and held in solitary confinement. The head of Tehran's justice department, Hojatoleslam Abbasali Alizadeh, says steps have been taken and that "these failings have now disappeared."
Now doubt the NYT and WAPO will devotes as much space in these revelations as they did on Abu Ghraib.

We had better prepare for an outraged Muslim populations, with the accompanying violence. After all, the conditions at Abu Ghraib prompted violence all over the globe. No doubt Islamic media will express their outrage at the humiliation of Muslims. No doubt we will read editorials about the 'evil' and hypocrisy of the perpetrators.

No doubt the Arab world will call for the leadership Mullahs to be brought to trial and to be declared guilty of any and all crimes. No doubt the Arab press will declare the Iranian Mullahs Nazis and 'Hitlers.'

No doubt an enraged Dick Durbin will refer to these nefarious torturers as 'Teletubbies.'

Well, chances are we won't see or hear of any of that.

We can be sure that whatever the problems, they are the fault of the (insert name of ethnic or religious group here).

It's Not As Simple As You Might Like

Our post on religion, The Argument Against God Is Always An Argument, garnered some interesting comments and more than a few emails. We will discuss those in a bit.

It was brought to our attention that we were remiss in stating that our ideas were our personal beliefs and opinion. We thought that was obvious- after all, a blog is venue for many things, including opinion. The blogosphere is in reality a platform for beliefs and opinions of all kinds.

We have always encouraged exchange- and often, our readers have been far more succint and insightful than we could ever be. As we have stated on previous occasions, we have some of the best and brightest readers out there. We have learned much from our readers. We acknowledge that and are grateful for that. That this blog has evolved into something other that the 'attaboy' comments is a testament to our readers. Many blogs 'preach to the choir' or rant at those who disagree.

We know many of you disagree with our views- as we may disagree with yours. That said, SC&A are pleased that we have a blog where civil exchanges and discourse are the rule- and not a blog where vitriol and visceral hatred- so prevalent and ubiquitous nowadays- are the playing fields, with the intent to cause hurt or pain the primary goal.

To disagree is not to be intolerant. To wave off or dismiss those with differing views is intolerant. It is a sad day when we dismiss those for being different from us. It is even a sadder day when civil discourse is eschewed, because one side or the other characterizes the other as 'less than' or 'evil,' etc.

A wise man once shrewdly observed that at times, we shared very different views than our grandparents. Somehow, we never saw our grandparents as 'evil.' The point was well taken. People can have different views and ideas and not be less than, or 'evil.' With time, we have even found that some of our views, ones we thought inviolate, have been modified. Maybe there was some wisdom there, after all.

All too often, we find ourselves in environments and social milieus that reinforce certain points of view. Sometimes, those environments and relationships make it very difficult to grow and evolve. We may come to understand nuance more clearly or realize that simplistic ideologies and slogans do not fully address an issue. Nevertheless, because we have constructed for ourselves these bullet-proof and cloistered environments, we cannot adapt and evolve without fear of losing our status and relationships within our group. That is very sad, indeed. There is far too much 'my way or the highway' ideology, with the rabid rapid response to those who don't follow the party line. Sometimes, civil debate is tolerated even less within the group than without. These sad truths apply to both the Left and Right.

So it is with any discussion of God.

Non believers insist that God requires blind faith and believers insist that non believers are irrational in their dogged battle to remove God from the realm of rational thought.

Such conversations are of course the red flag that those engaged in the debate know nothing of the subject being discussed.

Despite the incessant droning from non-believers, God does not demand blind faith- in fact, an argument can be made that is the last thing God wants. Both Moses and Abraham argue with God- and Abraham, the bible tells us, wants to enter into a contractual agreement with God- "If I can find ten decent people, you won't destroy the city. Do we have a deal, God?" In what is a profound revelation, God agrees! Blind faith? Hardly.

Believers argue that God must be inserted into a community and like it or not, God's rules are the final word. That of course, is an argument that is derived from the refuge of fools- those incapable of independent thought.

God instructs us to be independent- to have courts and consequences of our making. We are to have judges (juries) to determine our guilt or innocence. We are to have a government that is free from religious intimidation- all realities that highlight the distinction between God and our own responsibilities and obligations. In fact, in ancient Israel, a governor killed by a religious zealot was considered such a profound tragedy that a day if fast and mourning was declared. This fast and day of mourning is observed to this very day- no doubt as a warning not to let religious zealotry get in the way of governance.

We point these few things out to highlight that the discussion of God and religious beliefs are not simple or simplistic. To those who make it so and loudly dismiss believers- or non believers- we say, shame on you. If you are a believer, then you know that all men are equal before God. If you are a non believer, then you know all men are equal.

Think about it.

Tuesday, July 26, 2005

WANTED: CHILDREN TO TEST NEW THERAPY

Needed: Volunteers to test new therapy to help with childhood social skills.

Full description of therapy here.

The Argument Against God Is Always An Argument

Let's talk about God. Inasmuch as belief in a deity is now fodder for a journalistic inquisition into the beliefs of a potential Supreme Court Justice, there is one point that is rarely acknowledged.

We have to be talked out of our belief in God. We believe our instinctive beliefs point to a deity.

In other words, belief is God is a more natural state of affairs than non belief. Notwithstanding the inevitable (and shallow) arguments that belief in God is for weak people, and other such arguments, ad nauseum, the fact remains that while we may all argue over exactly what He/She/It is, we believe each of us is born with that inherent belief.

Non believers tell us about injustice and inequity, about the dark side of religion and a thousand and one other such notions. They want to engage us, to argue with us, so as to shake our beliefs, whatever they are.

There is no point in arguing, no point in defending belief in God. It is like trying to describe a painting to a blind person- or, as the Chinese say, "A frog in a well cannot be talked to about the ocean."

Some people will be forever comfortable in their wells. They are safe in the well and they retain control in their well. It is for them best to argue and debate the size and shape of the walls that contain them.

We look into the skies and night, and we know. We see a sunrise or sunset, and we know. We know that we don't know everything and we know that we don't have all the answers. We also know that it doesn't matter.

When we hear the ocean, we hear the same sound that God did at creation. We all hear the sound, that rhythmic soft sound as water laps the shore or the mighty roar of the waves crashing in on each others. We are instinctively drawn to those sounds, to reflect and ponder a mighty greatness. Whether it is the ocean, mountains or any other manifestation of nature, we listen- and we know.

In the end of course, we must allow for God to do His work and we must focus on our own.

We must do what we can to be better. We must focus on our relationships with our fellow man. We must bring them close and when need be, push them away. We must focus on the balance that effects and defines us. From Ecclesiastes:
To everything there is a season, a time for every purpose under the sun.
A time to be born and a time to die; a time to plant and a time to pluck up that which is planted;
a time to kill and a time to heal ... A time to weep and a time to laugh;
a time to mourn and a time to dance ...A time to embrace and a time to refrain from embracing;
a time to lose and a time to seek; a time to rend and a time to sew;
a time to keep silent and a time to speak; a time to love and a time to hate;
a time for war and a time for peace.
These words are as true today as the day they were written. They are logical and they reflect truths we all know.

There are days you will feel lost and alone. You will be angry- so angry that you will curse God. Even at that point, you still have to talked out of belief in God.

Those days, as you know from experience with them, are part of the landscape of the spiritual journey we all take. We have weathered them before and we will weather them again. Everyone we know weathers them (see The Anchoress, here) and as bitter as we get, we would not, in the end, trade our burdens for those of another. Long after we are gone, others will weather them and suffer the same agonies.

Real Days of Faith are the days that we struggle with belief, injustice and evil. Those require faith. The days of closeness to God are natural, and require no more than serenity. As we said, we don't have to be talked into belief in God. The arguments are about wresting belief away. That is what takes the effort.

Show us a man who struggles with his beliefs and and we'll show you a man of faith.

Years ago, we were given a book, called the Lonely Man of Faith(please read the link to Crosscurrents), by JB Soloveitchik. It remains for us, to this day, one of the most moving and profound essays on faith we have ever read. The impact of Soloveitchik's words still resonate with us, deeply. The following is from an essay on that book:
Still, both worlds, Soloveitchik says, are willed by God. It is therefore our destiny —and more importantly, our responsibility to recognize our loneliness, to recognize the distance between the two worlds. Only when we recognize our inability to create and secure our own home can we recognize and proclaim faith in God'’s unique redeeming power. The real crisis then is not our loneliness but our failure to recognize it.
Read the essay on the Lonely Man of Faith, here.

The truth is that there is no one truth (that is, there is no single spiritual journey), anymore than there is one kind of love. That should not preclude anyone from seeking God. It is also true that God manifests himself in ways and in the language that we understand- each of us.

Godliness is to be found in good men of all faiths. If the path, or the sound of the ocean is clear and unmuffled, follow it. Just because you don't undertand it all doesn't make it any less true.

We will write more on faith, in another post.

There's More! NOW How Much Would You Pay?

Because it is in excess of 100 degrees outside (and we had a carb laden Chinese buffet lunch that included sushi, $5.99, tax not included) , we are in no mood (read: bloated) to write a profound post. Instead, we have decided to share with you some of the more interesting items we have come across.

Parental fantasies
. If you haven't had this fantasy, you lie!

Eight out of ten
French people think they are good looking. Mass hysteria is the clinical term.

Chelsea Clinton is HOT
. She's going to marry into money, for sure.

If this is the marketplace speaking, what's next?

Not the sharpest knife in the drawer. Let me kiss you!

The SC&A Online Degree Program

Welcome to the initial SC&A Online Degree Program class. That's right, we'll help you actually learn something.

Head over to Stop The ACLU. Whether or not you agree, there are some interesting posts- and ideas to think about.

Maxed Out Mama won't quit intil she knows she has scared the daylights out of us. Her post on birds dying from unknown cause is frightening- and relevant to bio-terror and possible pandemics. The blog is a smorgasbord- enjoy.

The Barking Dingo
is on point- simply condemning terror isn't enough. He may not be an authority on pizza, but he knows what he's talking about in that post.

No Oil For Pacifists
tells you why to keep it real. The NYT it seems, has a more than a passing problem with the truth.

Finally, Small Dead Animals, discusses Carolyn Parrish, of 'The Americans are all bastards' fame.

With a few clicks, we'll help you become a lot smarter.

Pretend To Be Surprised

Walid Pahres (about more of whom can be read, here) has some not so shocking news. In a post entitled 'Fatal Naivite,' Professor Phares warns us that,
"Not only al Qaida is trying to infiltrating the CIA, but it has been attempting to do so since the mid 1990s. And not only the CIA, but also the FBI, and other security and military agencies. And let me add, not only through "Jamesbondian" sensational ways but by the book, and under US laws. Let me just throw this question at the memory of university professors across the nation: How many times were you approached over the past ten years to write a letter of recommendation for a student "very interested" in one of the agencies? Remember his/her reasons, research interest and ponder a little (...)
Sticking our collective head in the sand won't make those realities go away.

In a LA Times article, 'Al Qaeda answers CIA call,' Michael Sulick writes,
"as many as 40 possible terrorists may have attempted to infiltrate U.S. intelligence agencies in recent months, CIA expert Barry Royden reported at a national counterintelligence conference in March."
To be clear, there were up to 40 applicants to our national security apparatus that believed their clean records could withstand scrutiny. Sooner or later, some not so desirables will apply- and get in.

The implications are enormous.

The Catholic Fashion Show?

Nine women has defied Catholic Church Doctrine were ordained as priests and deacons aboard a tour boat near Ottawa, Canada.

We are not experts on Canon Law, so we cannot reasonably opine on the legalisms involved. We are not Catholic, so cannot reasonably comment on the impact this might have on the Church. We are not women, so cannot even guage what this really means to women in general.

What we can say is that from where we sit, we cannot see women as priests as a burning religious issue.

As we said in our post below,
When the individual or group agenda come in conflict with the needs of a greater societal need or for a greater unified good, we are in trouble. Anything that detracts from a societies need for a collective achievement that benefits all, is an assault on the foundations of that society. That isn't to say progressive ideals aren't worthy- many, are. Nevertheless, there remains priorities that we must consider. We can and do, revisit and rework ideas all the time.
While there may or may not be merit to the discussion of women priests (and unless you are theologian and an expert on Catholic doctrine, what the hell do you know?), we submit that for the moment, we have matters of greater import to deal with.

Monday, July 25, 2005

Where Does Government Belong In Our Lives, Or, E Pluribus Unum

Of all the roles government must play, it is the roll of the high wire artist that is the most critical. It is incongruous of course, that the so much of societal and cultural stability depends on the thin wire or rope, and that long balance pole, that holds up and supports our society.

More than anything, the history of the twentieth century probably was to be most instrumental in helping to define what government should be. Monarchies and despotism once ruled the world, most with imperialistic goals, gave way to harder and even crueler political and economic extremes, such as fascism and various forms of Marxism.

That century saw virtually every political experiment fail. What survived- and evolved, were the various forms of free societies that allowed the individual to determine much of his life.

The governments- and thus the societies that work- are those that manage the balance between the individual and communal good. The only way that can be achieved is if society is governed by principles of morality, justice and law and order. There are no other models that can sustain a society and common culture.

The struggle of maintaining the balance between individual rights and community rights is what makes our free societies work. It is not as easy balance, nor can it ever be defined by conservative or liberal ideals. The role of government is a work in progress. As citizens, it is our job to make sure that balance remains the first order of business for government.

We are all diverse in beliefs and ideals. There will always be some form of conflict- that is our nature. That does not mean that the conflict has to be violent or cruel- what it means is that we are entitled to our beliefs and we are entitled to defend them. We cannot however, impose our beliefs and ideals on others. There is a balance. To impose beliefs is an assault on basic individual liberties- by the same token, allowing an individual unrestrained personal freedom will lead to the breaking of laws and the cessation of respect for other people and their property.

Governments that do not trust their citizens will opt for an extreme. Totalitarian states ply their citizens with the fairy tale that it is for the good of the whole, that individual rights are momentarily neglected. Citizens are told that their sacrifice will someday make for a better society. Individualism and free expression become dangerous.

It is worth remembering that under totalitarian states, the most horrible crimes against humanity have occurred.

To be fair, many democratic experiments have failed, too, because at times, we put too much trust on citizens. As self interest is all too often the primary motivating factor, personal and political agendas often take center stage. It is no longer about the balance of the rights of the individuals and community, but rather, individuals and segments of the community attempt to claim for themselves whatever it is they want. Multiply that by hundreds, thousands or millions of agendas and we can see the impending implosion.

When the individual or group agenda come in conflict with the needs of a greater societal need or for a greater unified good, we are in trouble. Anything that detracts from a societies need for a collective achievement that benefits all, is an assault on the foundations of that society. That isn't to say progressive ideals aren't worthy- many, are. Nevertheless, there remains priorities that we must consider. We can and do, revisit and rework ideas all the time.

It is in these matters that government earns it's keep. Good government keeps us focused. Bad government does everything it can to do anything but keep us focused.

Good governments balances individual and communal rights. It is done by relying on moral or religious values- the same values that our forefathers used in defining the soul of the nation. The framers understood that men- all men- were fallible. To rely strictly on the goodwill of men was to deny the real human shortcomings of bigotry and greed, selfishness and hubris, or any of a thousand other human failings. The framers understood that we needed, at the very least, values that would keep us and our elected government, anchored.

Whether we care to acknowledge it or not, the origins of our values are religious in origin.

Our notions of equality, morality and justice are all derived from the Judeo-Christian ethic. That is an idea that is important for us to integrate. It is the Judeo-Christian ethic, that has evolved into the progressive engine of our value system.

Some of those values can be clearly identified. Respect and accommodation for all human life. Respect and accommodation for the family. Respect for the rights of others and respect for their property. Respect for laws and courts.

These are some of fundamental ideas that must serve as the foundation of a free society. Without the preservation and promulgation of these ideas, there is anarchy, as groups or individuals place their own desires above those of a community.

Those values mentioned earlier, must be accepted by all. Those values are what bind us, all of us, as one family. It is when those values are abrogated that we see society collapse in itself. There are no ideas or beliefs that supersede those fundamental values.

Those values, religious in origin, instruct us how to live our lives. We undertake that to preserve the rights of the individual, we must first protect the interests of our community.This is an imperative. The only way to preserve individual rights is to guarantee the common good.

These fundamental truths have taken this nation from the rocks at Plymouth to the most powerful nation on earth. We did not achieve this status through freedom from religion, but rather, through freedom of religion, enshrined in the Bill of Rights.

We do not separate church and state so as to marginalize God. That ideal is important so that government cannot impose a particular religion. The notion of that separation is in now way intended to deny God.

In dealing with many of the social disorders we face, perhaps we might consider approaching the matter in the same way the Constitution approaches and addresses the issues, as opposed to avoiding those issues.

It is via a real and permanent set of values- such as the ones we discussed earlier, that a strong nation and a strong identity are built. When the laws of man are recognized as having roots in something deeper, we have created something enduring- and living and growing.

"E Pluribus Unum"- "Out of many, one."

It is incumbent on us to remind our government that every community is comprised of many individuals. We must also remind our government that we will participate and each individual will contribute his individual strengths toward the greater good of a united community.

*UPDATE* Brazilian Hypocrisy

So the people in Brazil are upset at the London police shooting of one of their nationals? Well, that is understandable. It was after all, a real tragedy.

That said, we think much of the outrage in Brazil is a bit hypocritical.

Brazilian police have been shooting kids in the streets, for years.

See this ("In Brazil for example, four to five children are being killed every day), this, this and this, for starters.

If those crimes havn't outraged Brazilians enogh to actually do anything, we find it hard to believe that one more shooting in London might make a difference.

Brazilians coming together to criticize the UK is a lot like the OBL and the radical Islamists criticizing the US as being immoral and the root of all evil.

That dog just won't hunt.

*UPDATE* As we noted, Brazilian outrage is increasing.
Some of the protesters held banners denouncing British police as the real terrorists...All said Blair's apology did not go far enough.

"Apologies don't help, we want justice," they chanted...

Another article quotes the victim's mother:

"I'm totally outraged with the police. How can they kill workers?'' said Menezes' mother, Maria, heaving with tears in her modest concrete home at the end of a rutted dirt road 13 miles from the center of Gonzaga, population 7,000. "This is a pain that nothing is going to ever cure."
Of course, his death may be Amerca's fault- so implies his father:
Menezes' father, Matuzinho, said his son selected Britain because he got a work visa there after being rejected by the United States.
Of course.

No mention of course, of the shooting death of thousands of children in that country at the hands of police and vigilantes.

The Wandering Minds of SC&A

SC&A are having phone trouble. While we await the giant minds of BellSouth to come to our rescue, we have, in a moment of magnanimity, decided to share with you, some of the ideas we live by.

We don't care what your formal educational status is. We do care about what you have learned. Mostly, we care about how you share and transmit what you have learned or experienced. That says more about what you have learned than anything else.

Your work isn't you- it is what you do. It is also true that how you do what you do, does help to define you. Work is where you spend a lot of time. If you do good work, chances are you are a good person.

It is instinctive for us to want to help our fellow man. When we see hunger, we wish to feed the hunger. If we see anger, hate and violence, we shy away, as we should. If we see even a sliver of promise, it is up to us to help that person fulfill that promise. That is a lesson our adversaries need to learn.

To overcome poverty, of the material, educational and moral varieties, only work has the proven track record of eliminating those poverties. Sometimes, before you build, you have to clean up, so be prepared to do that, too.

Families do not result in the lack of freedom for anyone. What may seem like bondage to our families, provides a freedom that cannot be described. The time you devote to your family, will, in the end, be the truest snapshot of who you are, provide the measure of who you are and the influence you truly wield. The 'power' and depth of love of close knit families is directly proportional to how much time and meaning we invest in our families.

Just a few thoughts waiting for the phone person.

Earth Calling, Come In Please

In response to our post below, copithorne left the following comment.
America started a war in Iraq for an ideology.

You are saying that ideologies of this nature have their roots in inadequate parenting. Parents value ideologies above their children. Or, children value ideologies above their parents. The answer for this is more human contact so that people will value human relationships more and will be less likely to start wars.

People start wars when they are engaging in projection -- locating their disowned qualities in someone else and then attacking them as an enemy. This is the activity of Al Qaeda and Republicans. This article is an example of this projection. The bad qualities are all over there, in the enemy. There is no self awareness about one's own behavior and actions. In fact, the act of seeing the bad qualities in the other is an essential step in protecting the fragile self-system from self awareness of the conflicted qualities within oneself.

What makes the self-system fragile is bad parenting.

Good parenting would help people tolerate good and bad aspects within themselves so that they can stop projecting onto others. The struggle with an external enemy can become a struggle for character and integrity.

You ask how American non involvement in Iraq would stem the tide of Islamic radicalism. I don't understand how that question is coherent or relevant. Not starting a war would spare thousands of lives and billions of dollars. So one answer might be that spending billions of dollars building peace and democracy in the middle east would stem the tide of Islamic radicalism.

But again, the question is expressed in a context of projection in which radicalism is something that exists over there in the enemy and not within oneself and one's own behavior.

The article you write is about how good parenting is a foundation that protects against radicalism. The true implications of the article are tested when we apply it to ourselves as well.

If we had better parenting in this country would we be less likely to start wars? In many ways the answer has to be yes, but in other ways it is different because our manner of war is more abstract and commercialized than suicide terrorism.
This is a lovely comment, devoid of any connection to our current realities.

It is indisputable that the war in Iraq had little, if anything, to do with terror. Terror in the Middle East and North Africa, existed long before US policy either ignored or engaged in regional politics. Some of the worst and most egregious examples of terror are found in countries that have nothing to do with US foreign policy.

To imply that US policy has a deleterious effect on the current state of affairs is to be either deliberately deceitful or to be utterly uninformed on matters pertaining to the region. Further, to attempt in some way, via pretzel like intellectual gymnastics that our own foreign policy or ideology is responsible for the situation we find ourselves in, is utterly ridiculous.

Our foreign policy is predicated on our needs. That is the first job of government, to take care of our collective needs. This applies to governments of any administration. The purpose of any government policy is to fulfill the obligation that the government has to it's citizens- to look out after our needs first.

Our foreign policy is successful because our society and culture are superior to other societies and cultures. It’s that simple. Societies and culture can be measured. They are not all equal. Nazi Germany and Mayan tribes that celebrated human sacrifice, were not our equivalent, in any way, shape or form. The same can be said for any other culture or society. Any free society is superior than any other society. Free societies that defend freedom or encourage freedom are superior to those free societies that don't. Societies are measured by what they contribute, not by what they destroy. Period.

"America started a war in Iraq for an ideology."

Very true- that ideology is called freedom.
"People start wars when they are engaging in projection -- locating their disowned qualities in someone else and then attacking them as an enemy. This is the activity of Al Qaeda and Republicans."
This is close to the stupidist thing I've ever heard. Are you seriously comparing Republicans to Al Qaeda? Seriously? Tempting as it is to relegate you to the idiot bin, we have decided to ask you for any actual evidence you might have.
You ask how American non involvement in Iraq would stem the tide of Islamic radicalism. I don't understand how that question is coherent or relevant. Not starting a war would spare thousands of lives and billions of dollars. So one answer might be that spending billions of dollars building peace and democracy in the middle east would stem the tide of Islamic radicalism.
Are you saying that we should have given Saddam (and every other murdering butcher and corrupt thief) billions of dollars in the hope that he would have instituted a democratic government? And are so uninformed as to believe that simply throwing money at a problem will fix the problem? When has that ever worked? Was Bill Clinton wrong when he too, advocated the elimination of Saddam?
The article you write is about how good parenting is a foundation that protects against radicalism. The true implications of the article are tested when we apply it to ourselves as well.

If we had better parenting in this country would we be less likely to start wars? In many ways the answer has to be yes, but in other ways it is different because our manner of war is more abstract and commercialized than suicide terrorism.
Are you seriously comparing parents that celebrate the slaugter their children impose are our moral equivalents? Are you implying that the cultural environment that produces suicide bombers are is equivalent to our own?

What the hell is wrong with you?

Sunday, July 24, 2005

You Just Can't Make This Stuff Up

Hold The Applause, Really

From time to time, SC&A receive email that exceeds even our expectations of gross stupidity. Our post, Those Who Parent, Those who Don't And The Truth About Terror, seems to have touched a nerve. We have attracted the attention of the idiot brigade. We woke up to more than a few emails on the subject. We have selected two of the more coherent messages for your consideration.

One correspondent takes exception with our categorizations- another extols it's virtues.
"You are the son of a pig and whore cannot understand that the Koran is our parents. Parents can be weak but the Prophet (PBUH) and the holy Koran is perfect. You will kneel before us or we will kill you."
Another, more literate correspondent said,
"A Muslim mother and father are happy to take the instructions from the Koran. Your culture and god follows nothing but fashion and sex. Democracy is the c*** of your god because you let gays as equals and every christian woman wants to be raped because this is the christian style of whores. Good people will fight until they are martirs and kill you and your whores and your gays. There is no diference between the whores and the gays and the jews and the christians. We f*** your daughters and wives and mothers and we will teach you a lesson for the showing us as stupid. You are pigs and monkeys."
The message goes downhill from there, promising us a delightful and entertaining time together.

The proof, they say, is in the pudding. We take pride in knowing that we were right on the money in our post, as is evidenced by our correspondents own words.

No need for applause, really.

Saturday, July 23, 2005

Those Who Parent, Those Who Don't And The Truth About Terror

We spend a good part of our lives trying to control our destinies, immediate and long term.

Still, whatever choices we make in the futile attempt into deluding ourselves that we really are in control, there is always one nagging reality: in the back of our minds, we wonder about the roads not taken. There is always that gnawing doubt, about the road not taken, the path not seen, or what might have been.

For most of us, there is one exception, on truth that we know is unshakeable. That truth is the love we have for our children. It is perfect and there is no question about the depth of that love. No parent would return their baby to the hospital nursery in exchange for another.

This love is the most natural. The child born to those parents is completely dependent on those parents. The natural instinct of parents is to respond to those needs, regardless of face or creed, religion or ethnicity. A parent- any parent, cannot look into the eyes of an infant and not feel protective. Of course, that is how it is supposed to be.

A funny thing happens when you become a parent. Thoughts, ideas and definitions we so sure of, change- sometimes, drastically. The who and why of your parents and childhood come into clearer focus and overnight, much is understood.

Maybe most important of all, our own imperfections become clear and less clouded, because with the desire to do things right for our children, our limitations and failings must be dealt with. In being a parent, every single day offer us the chance to better ourselves by being better parents. It is a unique situation.

If these are truths are undeniable, how does it come to pass that societies produce and even celebrate terrorists? It would be easy to say that a communities implosion comes from neglect or indifference. We could feel sorry for people who are overwhelmed with poverty and despotic governments that have social systems stacked against them. It would be easy to say that, but it wouldn't be true.

What serves to undermine a society and thus the natural order of things, is an agenda calculated to do just that. Whether it is political or religious, a shrewdly devised agenda will do just that.

It worked for Mao, as millions of students tore through the Chinese countryside and destroyed the vestiges of thousand year old cultures. It worked for Stalin, as children learned to inform on their parents and it worked for Hitler, as millions of Germans filled stadiums screaming loyalty to the Aryan races and the Fuhrer's plan to clarify and codify God's plan for mankind. The hopes and dreams of parents were destroyed by these unnatural agendas.

One can only imagine the heartbreak of parents that understood that what was their right and priviledge, only to see it taken away- and to understand that the natural order of things, was to be usurped in the name of a government agenda- an agenda, that out of the need to self perpetuate, attempted to obviate nature.

It is no different with the culture and society that produces terrorists, supports terror and apologizes for terror.

The radical Islamists, like the Stalinists, Maoists and Nazis before them, steal children from their parents. They are indoctrinated with hate and indifference to life, in schools and institutions that are designed to amplify the most unnatural of instincts- that the state can replace parents.

The Stalinists, Maoists and Nazis were political ideologues. As such, they could only offer visions of an unknown future. The radical Islamists have religion as their vehicle, and they offer more than conjecture- they offer sanitized and scripted visions of a romanticized, thousand year past. All that is there for the taking, again, if only...as if the glories of a thousand years ago would be meaningful in today's world.

When Muslim parents reclaim their responsibilities and the natural order of things, much will change. It won't be easy- the Islamists have hijacked not only the schools and in many cases, governments but by definition, the religion as well. The truth is that we cannot do it for them- they have to do it for themselves. They are learning that they cannot buy their way out of their malaise- charities purporting to do good works, but in reality, are fronts for killing machines, can in no way cleanse the communal soul.

Islam reclaiming it's future has nothing to do our foreign policy, Israel or anything external. If Muslims truly want to reclaim their faith, they need to start at home and reclaim parenting- real parenting.

The biblical tale of Abraham and Isaac is instructive. Now matter how willing his servant is, God does not allow Abraham to sacrifice his son.

God does not demand from Abraham that he obviate his role as a parent. He insists rather, that Abraham resume his natural role as a parent. God does not need Abraham's son as a sacrifice.

Whether you read the story as literal or allegorical, the message is a powerful one.

Why We'll Win

This time, the bombs went off in Egypt, leaving scores dead and Al Queda crowing.

The battle is portrayed less and less about political ideology and more and more about raw power- religious zealots beating their chests as they crow about their strength.

The 'Allahu Akhbar!' isn't really a platitude to God. It has become a call to draw attention to the terrorists themselves, as if they are saying, 'Look at me! Look at how I make you cower in fear!' It was never about God, not really. There is no God that demands man demean himself to the level of an animal.

The terrorists, their supporters and apologists must turn their backs at certain truths- that real power is about conviction, not about force.

Real conviction and belief in justice demands those very attributes from those who demand it of us. Real strength does not need to create adversaries, or scenarios where adversaries can be created out of thin air, so as to promote an agenda.

Real strength does need an adversary, created to put itself in a sympathetic light. Real strength does not see itself- or have others see it- as heroic or even noble. Real strength is quiet, slow and steady, doing the job, without recognition or praise.

True strength does not maginify the failures and shortcomings 0f other. Real strength lift's and helps others, to become stronger.

Strength that is based on force, or the threat of force, is feared and reviled.

Strength that is predicated on decency and the belief that all men can excel or exceed themselves, is a strength that people desire.

Our adversaries don't have a clue.

In God's Name?

Imagine there was a church in the United States that was comprised of anywhere 2.8 million persons. Now, imagine that of that 2.8 million, fully 25% were given to racist and hate ideologies.

That means that there are 700,000 persons that would be the card carrying equivalents of the Ku Klux Klan.

Now, lets say that only 6% of that church membership would actually support and commit acts terror and hate. That means that there are 168,000 people, walking around, that would support acts of violence or hate.

Further, 32% of these church members believe that "Western society is decadent and immoral... should seek to bring it to an end."

The good news is that only 1% would actually do anything violent. That means there are only 28,000 persons, in our backyards, that would do us harm if the opportunity presented itself.

Pie in the sky? Pulling numbers out of thin air? Maybe, mabe not. See this.