Pipsqueakova’s Not Happy…

Pipsqueakova has been busted, and she isn't happy.

How to respond? By allying herself with bigots and racists- and then some.

Larisa is upset that we took on Ann el Khoury who shares her peculiar ideology when it comes to Hamas. Each believe we must recognize and deal with that racist and bigoted party 'because they were democratically elected.

As we have noted,

Adolph Hitler too, was democratically elected. Had free European nations boycotted or even eliminated the Nazi leadership, 50 million lives would have been spared. We are under no obligation to recognize or support any regime, even if democratically elected, that promises ‘rivers of blood.’

Pipsquekova has yet to answer that question. We will pose the same question to Larisa as we did to Ann el Khoury:

What is it about the cessation of hostilities and terror, secure borders and diplomatic recognition of Israel that is so vexing to the Palestinians? Those are the minimum requirements as noted by Israel, the UN, the US, and the EU. Which of those requirements are too onerous for the Palestinians and the Arab world?

As in el Khoury's case, we suspect we'll be waiting a long time for an answer.

Pisqueakova took umbrage at a comment we left at the Flying Imam. Apparently, we were very hateful.

Being democratically elected does not mean that civilized nations must accept and welcome those that profess hate.

As a German, you recall that Hitler, too, was democratically elected. The civilized world will not make the same mistake twice and give credence to those who espouse hate and bigotry. Had the west not appeased and recognized Hitler, a good case can be made that WW2 might have been averted. In any event, the Palestinians voted for Hamas- they have spoken. At least they are finally being honest. It isn't as if Hamas has ever hid it's agenda'- 'Itbach al yahud!' from the pulpits, media and in schools. The civilized world is under no obligation to to deal with these bigots, racists and purveyors of taqqiyah. They are proud to refer to themselves as the Nazis of our time.

Recall that in the last election, there were over 25 candidates who referred to themselves as abu Hitler' or variations thereof. Recall too, how many Palestinian publicly announce how they want 'finish the job' Hitler started.

We also noted that "To be clear, the civilized world is the one that does not demand that 'Hitler's job be finished'...That is reserved for the barbarians."

Clearly, Pipsqueakova, like Ann el Khoury, finds the stated intention of slaughtering Jews perfectly acceptable.

Pipsqueakova's obsessions aren't easily sated. She points to this exchange with Staton Jones, in which he forced to backtrack after we challenged him. He engages in some rather convoluted notions. He concedes that the Iran regime is anti semitic, but refuses to acknowledge the anti semitism that emanated from the pulpits (all well documented) in other Arab nations. He also questioned the magnituiude of FGM. We answered him in a comment.

To his credit, Jones did not preclude me from responding in his comments section, unlike both Pipsqueakova and Ann el Khoury.

It isn't really a surprise that Pipsqueakova allies herself with Ann el Khoury. Clearly, neither is immune to propagating deceit and passing it off as fact. Ann el Khoury would do well to verify Franklin Lamb's credentials- and honesty.

In any event, as we noted yesterday, Larisa Alexandranova is no stranger to real hate.

I know Andrew Sullivan just simply cannot help his obsession with Michelle Malkin. After all, there are few inflatable puppets who can manage to be horizontal and sit on their master’s lap at the same time. Malkin, by the way, is the inflated puppet in this scenario, although Andy can fill in when Malkin is unavailable.

…I mean really, even a gay man who making his living pandering to homophobes should be able to see just how flaccid his argument is. But then again, a gay man hating gays is the new party platform for the right.

It should come as no surprise that because Alexandranova goes after Sullivan because she doesn’t like his politics. She attacks him and his homosexuality, personally. How very tolerant. How very progressive.

We can only imagine what Alexandranova has to say about Condaleeza Rice.

Or others who disagree with her.